Skip to content

Conversation

@kingbuzzman
Copy link
Member

@kingbuzzman kingbuzzman commented Mar 14, 2025

To lower the barier of entry for questions like #1169

@kingbuzzman kingbuzzman marked this pull request as draft March 14, 2025 17:00
@kingbuzzman kingbuzzman marked this pull request as ready for review March 17, 2025 16:39
@kingbuzzman
Copy link
Member Author

@bluetech thoughts?

Copy link
Member

@bluetech bluetech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @kingbuzzman. The PR is well done!

I agree this can be useful in some situations. We can extend support for further manage.py test arguments in the future.

I left some comments, PTAL.

failfast is an option that already is inside of the standard test.py -- throws an error as its duplicated
checking to see if this keeps the linter happy...
@kingbuzzman
Copy link
Member Author

@bluetech let me know if there is anything else you want in the PR. Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@bluetech bluetech left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks again @kingbuzzman!

@bluetech bluetech merged commit 6f7fc26 into pytest-dev:main Apr 1, 2025
21 checks passed
@kingbuzzman kingbuzzman deleted the patch-3 branch April 1, 2025 17:45
@kingbuzzman
Copy link
Member Author

@bluetech can we close #1169 ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants